For the majority of the works published by Tolkien, and the works of others based off of his, the conflict set during the Second and Third Ages is revolved around resisting the invasions of the Dark Lord Sauron, as he attempts to conquer all of Middle-Earth under his rule. However, for all those who truly know his character, especially after watching the recent season of the Rings of Power, it is obvious to everyone that Sauron’s attempts at unity are oppressive and corrupt, with his intended rule being defined by by utter subjugation and abuse of power.

This has raised an interesting question, however, regarding the authenticity of the general idea. While Sauron may be a brutal tyrant, is uniting Middle-Earth truly a terrible idea. Even without Sauron’s influence, Middle-Earth possesses many flaws. It’s various kingdoms are divided and sometimes implied to be often at war with each other, with many suffering from the same conditions as the Dark Ages of Europe for which much of their culture is based off of. This can largely be attributed to the vast number of rival races in Middle-Earth such as the humans, elves, and dwarves.

Keeping this in mind, would it truly be an unethical idea to unite Middle-Earth, even by force if need be. If there was only one rule, would the conflicts not cease and there be greater capacity to end the other woes plaguing it.

In the Shadow of War game, the wraith of Celebrimbor recognized this question and decided to become the Bright Lord of a united Middle-Earth; though whether he would have been benevolent compared to his dark counterpart is unknown.

Overall, while his rule may be terrible, is Sauron’s goal of a unified Middle-Earth truly terrible?