LOTR:Articles for deletion

Articles for Deletion (AfD) is where LOTR users discuss whether articles should be deleted. Items sent here usually wait a couple of weeks while debate takes place on whether the article should be deleted or not; then the deletion process can proceed based on community consensus. The page is then:


 * Kept
 * Deleted per the deletion policy
 * Sent to Cleanup or BJAODN
 * Merged and/or redirected to an existing article
 * Renamed/Moved to another title
 * Userfied to the creator's user page or user subpage

When nominating an article for deletion, add template to the top of its page, which expands to:

Please vote below to either Delete or Keep

Unnecessary Categories
Delete: Category:Important facts & Category:What i have read By User:Kingofmen. Categories created for personal user information and personal user indulgences should not be allowed. I have not witnessed this being done anywhere else including here, all personnal effects like this are reserved to the user's personal page and that's where this user's info should be put. I vote delete. Thank you. DarkLantern 23:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Fell Beast
Delete: Duplicate articles. User created Fell Beast page which already exists as Fell beast. I vote delete. DarkLantern 21:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirecting to Fell beast. 01:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Oathbreakers
Delete: Now unnecessary.DarkLantern 19:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete: I'll let this go for a little bit, in case someone thinks otherwise. 20:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted 19:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Colonist
Delete: An unnecessary redundancy. The article could be deleted and the text integrated into the Gondor page. I vote delete. DarkLantern 09:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted 19:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Orc pit
Delete: Seems to be about what was shown in the movies and is pretty vague and even if it wasn't, the text might be better situated as a footnote on the Orcs page. I vote delete. DarkLantern 09:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted 19:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Birth of Uruk-Hai
Delete: The article is vague and biased to the movies if anything the text could be salvaged and used as a footnote on the Uruk-hai page. I vote delete. DarkLantern 15:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted Huh. I thought this was deleted awhile ago.  19:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Battle for middle-earth III
Delete: It's really not a useful page, and any information needs to be verified. 01:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Hold on: I stand by my earlier statement, but I think that there's a lot of information that people have brought together, and is there a place we could put it? Perhaps we could make a namespace just for Fandom.  20:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete: This game is not even announced and they speaks of units and buildings. Poor Smeagol

Delete: I think it's useless. I didn't know there was one, I knew about the expansion for BFME2. But thats the only thing close, get rid of it.--The dark marshal 11:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Maybe Delete: Well, now that you say it, I guess we could have something like that. But I still think they should rename the page to Battle for Middle Earth 2 Rise of the Witch-King if thats what they mean by BFME3.--The dark marshal 20:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * We've had discussions about fandom in the past, I think that it even ended in a vote; however if people now want to use a fandom or fanon namespace then go for it.-- 21:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Moved to Fandom:Battle for Middle-Earth III 20:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Castle Rendorith
Delete: I think this is fandom. I have never heard of it. It is not documented at the Tolkien Gateway. A google search turned up nothing accept for the article here. DarkLantern 14:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted 20:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Rohirrim rush
Delete: This is an unnecessary article almost spam. It denotes more of a vague personal opinion more than legitimate information. DarkLantern 14:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted 20:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Trilogy
Delete: Unnecessary. DarkLantern 14:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted 20:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Haradrim warrior
Delete: Looks like someone who choose to spam in a different way because look at it, whoever did it made no attempt to fill in anything, justify anything, or do anything at all. DarkLantern 04:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted 20:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Telum-or-Girithar
Delete: Looks like fandom, though I'm not sure. The names don't ring any bells. 21:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I Vote on Delete: Of course is it Fandom. The men awakened in the first year of the Sun. And this is a battle between men, 6000 years before the Rise of the Sun. --Thijs95 12:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted 15:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Archives

 * 2007-05-01 Archive
 * 2008-11-30 Archive